ߣߣƵ

ūDzԲ

Feature

Controlling traffic in space

17 August 2021
With the recent proliferation of small satellites, space is becoming more crowded all the time especially near Earth.

Space. The very word conjures vastness and emptiness. In fact, space is becoming more crowded all the time, especially near Earth. With the recent proliferation of small satellites, there’s an increasing need to control space traffic. Fortunately, and of the University of Auckland’s – are working on solutions.

Armellin is a professor and Pirovano is a postdoctoral research fellow, both in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. They are experts in astrodynamics, the study of the motion of man-made objects in space.

 Armellin first got into the field to understand the motion of asteroids and whether they might be dangerous for the Earth. Work he did with the European Space Agency helped determine that an asteroid due to approach Earth in 2029 wouldn’t pose a danger – and neither would its return in 2036. With no immediate need to save humanity from the fate of the dinosaurs, Armellin turned to a much more credible danger: space debris.

Image
Laura Pirovano and Roberto Armellin

The space junk problem

Space is admittedly a lot emptier than a city. But just as there’s more traffic on some roads than others, there are more man-made objects in some regions of space than others.

Low Earth orbit is the “downtown” of space because it’s close to Earth. This means it’s cheaper and easier to get satellites and astronauts up there.

The next busiest region is geostationary orbit. This is much further out but at a specific altitude: 35,786 km from Earth. Satellites in this orbit travelling at three kilometres per second spin at the same rate as the Earth, allowing them to stay in an apparently fixed position in the sky. This is useful for telecommunications satellites, because an antenna on Earth can always remain pointed at that satellite.

Satellites’ lifetimes can span from a few months to decades. Once their mission is over, guidelines suggest removing them from protected regions within 25 years. However, because until relatively recently there were no regulations about what to do with dead satellites, a lot of them are still orbiting Earth in the busy zones. Also, some spacecraft launches were designed to cast off parts. That’s not even mentioning the loose springs and screws.

“If we do not know an object is in a certain orbit, it’s basically a wandering bullet,” says Pirovano. “It may hit a satellite, destroy it and create thousands more pieces of space debris. That’s why it’s very important to have an accurate catalogue of objects in space.”

Cataloguing space debris

A major part of Pirovano and Armellin’s work is cataloguing space objects.

“You can’t regulate traffic if you don’t know where the cars are,” Armellin says.

The difficulty for scientists is that though it may be possible to observe unknown objects, they’re observed for such a short time that it’s hard to know where they’re going or if two observations scattered over time are of the same object.

The catalogue must also be maintained because objects may move from their previously known orbits. For that reason, part of Pirovano’s research is about detecting satellite manoeuvres.

The catalogue Pirovano and Armellin have been working on with international colleagues now contains about 37,000 objects of ten centimetres and above in size.

“If you go down to a centimetre, though, there are at least 700,000 objects in space,” says Armellin. “Problem is, the catalogue is not complete. Considering we now have a lot of cube satellites of ten cubic centimetres, a bullet of one centimetre would completely destroy it.”

Space junk

Predicting collisions

For a satellite to avoid a collision, it has to know one is likely. Several private companies now popping up internationally propose to help governmental efforts, says Armellin.

“Satellite operators receive messages that tell you, ‘Your spacecraft is going to have a conjunction on this date, at this distance, with a collision probability of this value.’”

One challenge is the aforementioned problem of knowing what’s out there. Another is accurately determining the trajectory of space objects.

 

“As activity in space increases, the number of conjunction messages you receive is going to increase significantly,” says Armellin. “Sometimes the accuracy of these conjunction messages is low, so people might take the risk of not manoeuvring.

“When you’re driving a car, you might feel you’re at risk when your car is 30 centimetres from another one. Currently, these systems say a spacecraft is in danger when it’s a kilometre away from another one. So we have a lot of conjunction messages we need to process for events that are actually not dangerous. If we improve the accuracy, then we reduce false alarms, so space traffic control becomes more practical.”

“If we do not know an object is in a certain orbit, it’s basically a wandering bullet.”

Laura Pirovano

Avoiding collisions

Once collisions can be predicted with a higher degree of accuracy, the next challenge becomes figuring out what to do about them. If the predicted collision is with a piece of space debris, the satellite has to move over. If it’s with an active satellite, though, the two satellites have to coordinate a response.

The problem is, projected collisions could occur with little notice at any time of day or night, potentially between two operators who aren’t in contact or who don’t speak the same language. 

The solution? Autonomous manoeuvring. 

With other colleagues, Armellin and Pirovano are working on using artificial intelligence and machine learning to decide what to do when two objects are due to closely approach each other and to perform any necessary manoeuvres. While Armellin and Pirovano aren’t machine learning experts, they are contributing their knowledge of space objects and their motion in helping improve autonomous systems.

“It’s a challenge because the software always needs to have an answer and that answer needs to be reliable,” says Armellin. “On top of that, the answer needs to be optimal, because space is expensive, so you always need to use the minimum amount of propellant in the minimum time.”

Cleaning up the mess

These days, satellites need to have an end-of-life plan. For satellites in geostationary orbit, the accepted solution is to move further away from Earth into a graveyard orbit. 

“The problem is that a graveyard orbit doesn’t remove the problem,” says Armellin. “In the future, these regions of space may become of interest to other missions and then the space junk out there may interfere.”

Satellites in low Earth orbit are supposed to have enough fuel at the end of their lives that they can be pulled into Earth’s atmosphere, where small satellites burn up and larger ones can be manoeuvred to crash into the ocean. 

“However, operators may tend not to implement end-of-life manoeuvres because basically, you’re wasting propellant to kill the spacecraft,” says Armellin. Armellin and some of his colleagues have been working on a solution that exploits satellites’ orbit perturbations to reduce the change in velocity necessary to make a spacecraft re-enter the atmosphere. 

“It’s cheaper and the satellite can continue to do science while in this phase of slowly spiralling down to the Earth,” says Armellin.

Another University of ߣߣƵcolleague, Professor , director of , is working on ways to . Because complex problems tend to require multiple solutions, both groups are contributing to solving the space junk problem. 

“We’re space engineers so there’s room for shaping the future,” says Armellin. 

“There’s a lot to be done,” agrees Pirovano. “That means there’s a lot of opportunity.”

Want to connect with the University’s space research?